Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76308 (ALL)

NEELAM VERMA v. STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9979/2025 · 2025-07-20

Manju Rani Chauhan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:118262 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9979 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neelam Verma Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arti Raje,Shriya Raje Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Ms. Arti Raje, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondent authorities to transfer the petitioner from Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Pootha, Vikas Khand, Jaitpur Kala, Agra, to a different block closer to her residence, preferably Acchnera. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has two minor daughters and a bedridden mother-in-law, therefore, she has moved representation before respondent no.4 to consider her transfer from Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Pootha, Vikas Khand, Jaitpur Kala, Agra, to a different block closer to her residence, preferably Acchnera but nothing has been done till date. Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.4, on the basis of instructions, submits that petitioner is a single teacher working in the Institution. She further submits that she has no objection, in case a fresh representation is given by the petitioner before the respondent no.4, the same may be decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all her grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.4 Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board, Prayagraj, within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.4 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Rahul. Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad