Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76306 (ALL)

SMT. VIDYAWATI @ VIDYAWATI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/9893/2025 · 2025-07-17

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:116524 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9893 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Vidyawati @ Vidyawati Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:- "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/ directing to the respondent No. 3 to paid/release family pension to the petitioner as per Rules 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28 of Rules 1964. II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/ directing to the respondent No. 4 to paid due arrears of pension of the husband of the petitioner for period from 01.07.2014 to 20.12.2024 along with interest according with law. III. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/ directing to the respondent No. 2 to regularized service of husband of the petitioner under Section 33G (amended in year 2016) of the U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board, Act 1982 dated 22.03.2016 forthwith or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri R. P. Tiwari, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri R. P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned standing counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 Deputy Director (Secondary), Gorakhpur Region, Gorakhpur within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.3 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad