Lakshmi Kant Shukla, Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76287 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76287 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15612 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the First Information Report dated 10.08.2024, giving rise to Case Crime No. 253 of 2024, under Sections 191, 115(2), 352, 110 B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(va), 3(1)(Dha) SC/ST Act, Police Station Phoolpur, District Prayagraj.
2. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Yadav, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bijay Kumar, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3, Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record.
3. After some length of arguments, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State apprised the Court that the investigation has already been completed and after completion of the investigation a charge-sheet against petitioner nos. 1,2,4 and 5 has also been filed on 16.05.2025 for offences punishable under Sections 115(2)/352 B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(va) & 3(1)(Dha) of SC/ST Act and petitioner no. 3 has been exonerated as no material has been found against him during the investigation.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. with liberty to the petitioners to avail other remedy available to them under the law.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bijay Kumar, G.A. Aqib And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
counsel for the parties and the fact that investigation has already been completed and a charge-sheet has also been filed, we do not find any good reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, in view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail such other remedy available to them under the law, as advised. October 13, 2025 Brijesh Maurya CRLP No. 15612 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad