Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93647 Court No. - 84 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22500 of 2024 Applicant :- Ramaruj Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rishabh Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shashank Singh Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant, and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 20.12.2015, summoning order dated 31.03.2016 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 1116 of 2016 (State of U.P. vs. Ramaruj), arising out of Case Crime No. 1240 of 2015, under Sections 332, 353, 506 IPC, P.S. North, District- Firozabad, pending ion the Court of CJM, Firozabad, on the basis of compromise verification report of the CJM, Firozabad dated 01.07.2024. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court, thereafter, applicant approached this Court by filing Application U/S 482 No. 9958 of 2024 and the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.05.2024 directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide order dated 01.07.2024 verified the parties as well as compromise application through their counsels. Verification report is filed as annexure-5 to the present application. Thereafter, applicant filed the present 482 Cr.P.C. application to quash the entire proceedings pending against the applicant in terms of compromise entered into between the parties. He further submitted that applicant and opposite party no.2 compromised the matter and opposite party No.2 does not want to proceed the matter against the applicant. He further submitted that applicant and opposite party no.2 have settled through compromise their private and civil dispute and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicant. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicant and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 does not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. He submits that opposite party no. 2 has no objection, if the proceedings in the aforesaid case are quashed. 5. Learned AGA submitted that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the court, hence, no reason to proceed further. 6. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC, 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non- compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case. 8. Accordingly, the impugned charge sheet dated 20.12.2015, summoning order dated 31.03.2016 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 1116 of 2016 (State of U.P. vs. Ramaruj), arising out of Case Crime No. 1240 of 2015, under Sections 332, 353, 506 IPC, P.S. North, District- Firozabad, pending ion the Court of CJM, Firozabad, are hereby quashed. 9. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Aditya Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad