Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76266 (BOM)

M/S. JET BUILDERS LLP v. MR. MUBARAK ALI MOHAMMED SIDIQUE SHAIKH

IA/11633/2025 · 2025-12-24

Kamal Khata

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12-asia-11633-2025+.doc Sumedh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.11633 OF 2025 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.333 OF 2024 M/s. Jet Builders LLP ... Applicant In the matter between Mubarak Ali Mohammed Sidique Shaikh ... Appellant V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. ... Respondents WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.333 OF 2024 _______________________ Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate a/w. Adv. Ankit Lohia, Adv. Miloni Gala, Adv. Riddhi Dhamecha i/by Dhiren Shah for the Applicant. Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w. Adv. Devansh Shah, Adv. D.D. Singh for the Respondent. Mr. Sachin Vajale i/by Adv. Komal Punjabi for the Respondent- BMC. Mr. Nirav Kumar J., S.E., K/W Ward, present. _______________________ CORAM : KAMAL KHATA, J. DATED : 24TH DECEMBER 2025. P.C. : 1. The Advocates for the Appellants and Respondent submits that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. The parties to the consent terms, who are present in Court, have been 1/3 SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE Digitally signed by SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE Date: 2025.12.26 10:36:25 +0530 12-asia-11633-2025+.doc identi?ed by the Court Sheristedar, and have con?rmed their respective signatures on the Consent Terms. The Advocates for the parties have also appended their signatures to the Consent Terms con?rming its due execution. 2. The parties who are present con?rm before the Court that the Consent Terms have been executed of their own volition and without any coercion or undue inAuence. 3. The Consent Terms tendered are accepted and marked “X” for identi?cation with today’s date. 4. Having perused the Consent Terms, I ?nd them to be in order, not contrary to law, and reAective the true intentions of the parties. 5. The undertakings contained in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court. 6. The Registry shall ensure that the hard copy of the signed Consent Terms is permanently retained on record and not sent for destruction in the ordinary course. 7. Advocate for the Respondent submits that their clients will vacate all the structures in their possession on or before 7th January 2026. 8. Mr. Godbole, learned Senior Counsel submits that the plan of the shop proposed to be allotted, presently not annexed to the 2/3 12-asia-11633-2025+.doc Consent Terms will be annexed by the end of the day today. 9. Mr. Godbole clari?es that the premises proposed to be allotted is road facing and presently in two parts the road facing part is admeasuring 300 sq.ft. and the rear admeasures 200 sq.ft. The said two premises will be converted into one singular premises of 500 sq.ft. subject to permission granted by the BMC. 10. Appeal and Interim Application stand disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. 11. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (KAMAL KHATA, J.) 3/3