1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL & SRI. M.N. UMASHANKAR, MEMBER W.P.No.3180/2023 (GM-CPC) (Lok Adalat No.8235/2025) BETWEEN: 1 . SRI. SHIVARAM SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. LATE LOKAYYA SHETTY, R/AT MALLUR DHOTA HOUSE, MALLUR POST AND VILLAGE, MANGALORE TALUK - 575029. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SACHIN B.S. ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . SMT. SAVITHA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, W/O. JAYA SHETTY, R/AT ALIKE DEVIKRUPA HOUSE, 2 GANJIMATA, MANGALORE - 575001. 2 . SMT. KUSUMA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, W/O. JAYARAMA SHETTY, AND D/O. LATE LOKAYYA SHETTY, R/AT MALLUR DHOTA HOUSE, MALLUR POST AND VILLAGE, MANGALORE TALUK - 575001. 3 . SMT. VASANTHI SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O. KORAGA SHETTY, AND D/O. LATE LOKAYYA SHETTY, R/AT PUSHPA NIVASA, WAGLE ESTATE, PADUUVAL NAGARA, THANE, MAHARASTRA STATE - 400604. 4 . SMT. SHOBHA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, D/O. LATE LOKAYYA SHETTY, R/AT MALLUR DHOTA HOUSE, MALLUR POST AND VILLAGE, MANGALORE TALUK - 575001. 5 . SMT. SANDYA SHETTY, W/O. KISHORE SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT THALAPADY, DODDAMANE HOUSE, THALAPADY POST AND VILLAGE, MANGALORE TALUK - 575001. 6 . SRI. SANDESH CHOWTA, S/O. LATE SAROJINI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NELLIDHADI GUTTHU, 3 BAJPE VILLAGE AND POST, MANGALORE TALUK - 575001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KETHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5 R6 SERVED ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 18/01/2023 PASSED ON I.A.NO.14 IN O.S. NO.33 OF 2014 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND C.J.M., D.K., AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW THE I.A.NO.14 AS PRAYED FOR, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. THE PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER This writ petition is filed by the petitioner praying to set aside the impugned order dated 18.01.2023 passed on IA.No.14 in O.S.No.33/2014 by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge and CJM, D.K., and consequential prayer to allow IA.No.14. 2. Sri.Sachin B.S., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Kethan Kumar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5 submit that the matter has 4 been settled before the trial Court. A memo to that effect is filed, which reads as under: "The counsel for the petitioner & respondents humbly submits the present writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 18.01.2023 passed on IA.No.14 in O.S.No.33/2014 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge & CJM, D.K. However, on 14.09.2024 parties before trial Court have filed the compromise petition and suit came to be disposed. The same may be taken on record and dispose the above writ petition accordingly." 3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER ABK