Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76235 (KAR)

B J SATISH v. SUNIL JAYADEVAPPA

WP/24288/2025 · 2025-08-28

M Nagaprasanna

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33583 WP No. 24288 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 24288 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: B J SATISH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O B.J.SRIPADA RAO, KEREKOPPA GRAMA, ULAVI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577434. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SUNIL JAYADEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O B.JAYADEVAPPA, R/O. GOPALAGOWDA BADAVANE, SHIVAMOGGA TOWN, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577205. 2. GOWRAMMA BELURU JANA, W/O B.J.SRIPADA RAO, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33583 WP No. 24288 of 2025 AGED 80 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST AND HOME MAKER, R/O. KEREKOPPA VILLAGE, ULAVI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577434. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 30.06.2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SORABA ON I.A.NO.II IN O.S.NO.19/2024 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-H TO THE WRIT PETITION. B) ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTIO REJECTING THE APPLICATION SEEKING AMENDMENT OF PLAINT HEREIN IN OS.NO.19/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SORABA. C) ISSUE ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THE HONBLE COURT FINDS IT APPROPRIATE IN ORDER TO SECURE THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33583 WP No. 24288 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order allowing an application filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC seeking amendment of the plaint. Admittedly, the application is allowed before the issues would be framed. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this juncture, submits that he be reserved liberty to urge all the contentions before the concerned Court at the appropriate time. 3. In the light of the said submission, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition without interfering with the impugned order and reserving liberty as sought for by the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44