IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 108 RAJENDER KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA quashing the order dated 07.03.2025, Annexure P representation submitted by the petitioner against giving Award-2020 to respondents no.6 and 7 under Elementary School Head Master (ESHM) category 15.07.2021, whereby the Award has been given to these two respondents. 2. sixth and seventh respondent were recommended by the District Level Committee on the basis of their merit. accordingly, considered their cases and found them more meritorious as compared to the petitioner. The marks have been awarded as per the cri laid down in the revised P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28661 Date of decision: RAJENDER KUMAR Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Ms. Binayjeet Sheoran Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia quashing the order dated 07.03.2025, Annexure P representation submitted by the petitioner against giving 2020 to respondents no.6 and 7 under Elementary School Head Master (ESHM) category, has been rejected, as also the 15.07.2021, whereby the Award has been given to these two respondents. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the names of the sixth and seventh respondent were recommended by the District Level Committee on the basis of their merit. accordingly, considered their cases and found them more meritorious as compared to the petitioner. The marks have been awarded as per the cri laid down in the revised Policy. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 28661-2025 Date of decision: November 12, 2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Advocate Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 07.03.2025, Annexure P-3, whereby the representation submitted by the petitioner against giving State Teacher 2020 to respondents no.6 and 7 under Elementary School Head , has been rejected, as also the order dated 15.07.2021, whereby the Award has been given to these two respondents. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the names of the sixth and seventh respondent were recommended by the District Level Committee on the basis of their merit. The State Level Committee, accordingly, considered their cases and found them more meritorious as compared to the petitioner. The marks have been awarded as per the criteria ...Petitioner ...Respondents certiorari 3, whereby the State Teacher 2020 to respondents no.6 and 7 under Elementary School Head order dated A perusal of the impugned order shows that the names of the sixth and seventh respondent were recommended by the District Level The State Level Committee, accordingly, considered their cases and found them more meritorious as teria Jaspreet Kaur 2025.11.14 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP-28661- 3. any illegality or conferring the Award. 4. it stands dismissed November 12 Jaspreet Kaur -2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any illegality or irregularity about the procedure having been followed in conferring the Award. In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and it stands dismissed in limine. November 12, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out the procedure having been followed in In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out the procedure having been followed in In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition and Jaspreet Kaur 2025.11.14 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh