Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76218 (PNJ)

POONAM RANI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/18977/2025 · 2025-07-10

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 147 Poonam Rani State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. services of the petitioner 2. pursuant to selection process conducted after issuance of advertisement in the newspaper, as a Computer Assistant on was even promoted vide order dated regularized, P-10, has been submitted, He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learne counsel has no objection. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Poonam Rani Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. C.L.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made is for directing respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner working on temporary/contract basis. Learned counsel submits that the petit pursuant to selection process conducted after issuance of advertisement in the newspaper, as a Computer Assistant on was even promoted vide order dated 08.11.2017, Annexure P regularized, regarding which a representation dated 21.08.2024, Annexure has been submitted, but the same has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learne counsel has no objection. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18977-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 10.07.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made is for directing respondents to regularize the working on temporary/contract basis. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was appointed pursuant to selection process conducted after issuance of advertisement in the newspaper, as a Computer Assistant on 18.09.2008, whereafter she 08.11.2017, Annexure P-7, but not representation dated 21.08.2024, Annexure has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.10 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-18977-2025 -2- 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 21.08.2024, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 10.07.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.10 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.