Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76204 (KAR)

SMT. NARASAMMA v. SRI. HANUMANTHARAJU

RFA/1190/2023 · 2025-09-18

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39412-DB RFA No. 1190 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1190 OF 2023 (PAR/DEC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NARASAMMA D/O LATE CHIKKANARASHIMAIAH W/O LATE RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 2. SMT VARALAKSHMI D/O LATE CHIKKANARASHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 3. SMT MANJULA D/O LATE CHIKKANARASHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT MUDDANAPALYA VILLAGE, VISHWANEEDAM POST, YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU 560091. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SOMASHEKARAIAH H M., ADVOCATE- ABSENT) Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39412-DB RFA No. 1190 of 2023 AND: 1. SRI. HANUMANTHARAJU S/O LATE CHIKKANARASHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 2. SRI NARASHIMA MURTHY S/O LATE CHIKKANARASHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R1 AND R2 ARE R/AT MUDDANAPALYA VILLAGE, VISHWANEEDAM POST, YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU 560091. 3. SMT H MAHALAKSHMI D/O. HANUMANTHRAJU W/O T. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT VAJARAHALLI, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE HULLARAIAH AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS R/AT BYLALU VILLAGE, THAVAREKERE HOBLI, CHUCHANA KUPPE POST, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.02.2023 PASSED IN OS NO.2596/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39412-DB RFA No. 1190 of 2023 VI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-11), DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION. THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) There is no appearance for the appellants. 2. Till today, office objections are not complied. Therefore, in view of the peremptory order dated 09.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required. 3. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PN List No.: 4 Sl No.: 10