HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 3221 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard Sri Radhey Shyam Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Sanjeet Kumar Dubey, learned counsel holding brief of Sri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4 and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of State respondent. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent No.1 in considering the representation of the petitioner dated June 3, 2025. 3. Upon due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the authority concerned should decide the representation of the petitioner dated June 3, 2025. 4. Accordingly, the respondent no.1 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated June 3, 2025 within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. September 15, 2025 DKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Radhey Shyam Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, C.S.C. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) M/S Shanti Glass Industries .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTWA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad