IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 108 Chokhram Anurag Rastogi, Chief Sector 1, Chandigarh and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings interim order dated ordinate Bench of this Court in “Ved Parkashand others vs. State of Haryana and others”, whereby while issuing notice of motion, the petition was ordered to be heard alongwith connected petition i.e. CWP was also directed in th order dated 21.5.2025 passed by co COCP No.1789 of 2025 titled as “Ramkaran and others vs. Anurag COCP-1729-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1729 of 2026 Date of decision : Chokhram Versus Anurag Rastogi, Chief Secretary, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Sector 1, Chandigarh and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. K.K. Saini, Advocate with Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent order dated 21.10.2024 (Annexure P ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP Nos.28426 of 2024 titled as “Ved Parkashand others vs. State of Haryana and others”, whereby while issuing notice of motion, the petition was ordered to be heard alongwith connected petition i.e. CWP-26240 was also directed in the same terms. Learned counsel for the respondent order dated 21.5.2025 passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in COCP No.1789 of 2025 titled as “Ramkaran and others vs. Anurag 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1729 of 2026 (O & M) Date of decision :-18.04.2026 …..Petitioner Secretary, Haryana Civil Secretariat, …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA K.K. Saini, Advocate with Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondents for not complying the (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- CWP Nos.28426 of 2024 titled as “Ved Parkashand others vs. State of Haryana and others”, whereby while issuing notice of motion, the petition was ordered to be heard 26240-2024 and interim order Learned counsel for the respondent-State refers to the ordinate Bench of this Court in COCP No.1789 of 2025 titled as “Ramkaran and others vs. Anurag VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.18 16.49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Rastogi and others” whereby the petition was disposed of statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that “….the petitioner would be paid the revised pension in terms of the revision carried out in pursuance of the order dated 03.8.2023 from the date the stay was granted in the present the same would be done subject to the further orders passed in CWP 4971-2025. It is submitted that the arrears on the said account would be released within a period of three weeks from today. It is however submitted that the relea month in pursuance of the orders dated 03.8.2023 should not be construed as an estoppels against the respondents from opposing the writ petition.” of the sa compliance would be made within three weeks from today. does not press the present petition any further. petition in case the abovesaid undertaking is not complied with by the respondents. April 18, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-1729-2026 (O & M) Rastogi and others” whereby the petition was disposed of statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that “….the petitioner would be paid the revised pension in terms of the revision carried out in pursuance of the order dated 03.8.2023 from the date the stay was granted in the present the same would be done subject to the further orders passed in CWP 2025. It is submitted that the arrears on the said account would be released within a period of three weeks from today. It is however submitted that the release of the said amount and the payment every month in pursuance of the orders dated 03.8.2023 should not be construed as an estoppels against the respondents from opposing the writ petition.” Learned counsel for the State of the said order dated 21.5.2025, referred above, necessary compliance would be made within three weeks from today. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. Dismissed as not pressed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the contempt petition in case the abovesaid undertaking is not complied with by the respondents. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Rastogi and others” whereby the petition was disposed of on the statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that “….the petitioner would be paid the revised pension in terms of the revision carried out in pursuance of the order dated 03.8.2023 from the date the stay was granted in the present case i.e. 21.2.2025 and the same would be done subject to the further orders passed in CWP- 2025. It is submitted that the arrears on the said account would be released within a period of three weeks from today. It is however se of the said amount and the payment every month in pursuance of the orders dated 03.8.2023 should not be construed as an estoppels against the respondents from opposing the Learned counsel for the State undertakes that in terms id order dated 21.5.2025, referred above, necessary compliance would be made within three weeks from today. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. ranted to the petitioner to revive the contempt petition in case the abovesaid undertaking is not complied with by the Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.18 16.49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document