Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76191 (KAR)

HATSOFF HELICOPTER TRAINING PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

WP/24803/2025 · 2025-10-16

K S Hemalekha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41448 WP No. 24803 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.24803 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: HATSOFF HELICOPTER TRAINING PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE OPP. ARDC, HAL, VIBHUTIPURA, MARATHAHAALY POST, BENGALURU-560037. REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY/ COMPANY SECRETARY & MANAGER (HR) ADYA OJHA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI CHANDRASHEKAR H.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BESCOM, S-17 SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU-560 017. 2. THE BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY (BESCOM), CORPORATE OFFICE, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KARTHIKEYAN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OR SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 25.09.2024 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41448 WP No. 24803 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files memo, which reads as under: “The undersigned respectfully submits that, the Petitioner has filed the above petition challenging the notice issued by the 2nd Respondent demanding for the Back Billing Charges. The 2nd Respondent passed an order on the merits of the notice. In view of the same the petitioner is intending to challenging the Order passed. Thus this writ petition as become infructuous. It is submit that, the petitioner reserving the liberty to challenging the said order prays for the dismissal of this Writ Petition. Hence this memo.” 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 84