Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76186 (KAR)

JBF RAK LLC v. GANAPATHY INDUSTRIES

COMAP/206/2024 · 2025-10-29

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 206 OF 2024 BETWEEN 1. JBF RAK LLC, OFFICE AT: POST BOX NO. 6574, AL JAZEERA, AL HAMRA, RAS AI KHAIMAH, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, REPRESENTED BY IT’S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE: SRI SUNIL SHUKLA, SON OF SRI TRIBHUVANNATH SHUKLA, AGED 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT: NO A-401, JP DECKS, NEXT TO DINDOSHI COURT, GENERAL A. K. VAIDYA MARG, MALAD EAST, MUMBAI – 400 097. 2. JBF BAHRAIN W.L.L., OFFICE AT: BLDG 461, ROAD 1508, …2 COMAP NO.206/2024 2 BLOCK 115, ALHIDD, B.L.L.P., SALMAN IND CITY, BAHRAIN, REPRESENTED BY IT’S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE; SRI SUNIL SHUKLA, SON OF SRI TRIBHUVANNATH SHUKLA, AGED 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT: A-401, JP DECKS, NEXT TO DINDOSHI COURT, GENERAL A. K. VAIDYA MARG, MALAD EAST, MUMBAI - 400 097. ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri/Smt. : GAURAV SHUKLA, SOM SINHA, HEMANT SHUKLA, CHETAN TAYAL AND IMRAN G., ADVOCATES) AND GANAPATHY INDUSTRIES, HAVING IT’S OFFICE AT: FACTORY NO. 31, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, YESHWANTHPUR, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA, INDIA – 560 022. …RESPONDENT/S The Advocate for the appellant has filed the above COMAP / Commercial Appeal Under Section 13 (1A) of the Commercial Courts Act read with Order XLIII Rule 1 (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, Praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: …3 COMAP NO.206/2024 3 a. That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the Impugned Order dated 6th January, 2024 passed by the Hon'ble LXXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-84), Commercial Court at Bangalore in Commercial Original Suit No. 749 of 2023 (Exhibit - ) b. Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Appeal, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to restrain the Respondent from disposing off the good which were admitted delivered to them and are in admitted possession of the Respondent. IN ALTERNATIVE:- c. Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Appeal, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to appoint Court Receiver to take inventory of the goods in possession of the Respondent and also take possession of the goods which were admittedly delivered to them by the Appellants; d. For ad-interim and interim reliefs in terms of prayer clause b to c, e. For costs, f. For such other and further reliefs as the facts of this case may warrant; …4 COMAP NO.206/2024 4 This Commercial Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following order: ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) There is no representation for the appellant. Finally, two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand rejected without reference to the Bench. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 29.10.2025, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is hereby rejected. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : SB C By : PH Ty dt : 26.12.2025 C.dt : 02.02.2026