- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28074 WP No. 19694 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 19694 OF 2025 (L-RES) BETWEEN: CHANNAPPA S/O SHARANAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, WORKING AS SKILLED FARM WORKER(T/S) R.E.C. SUB UNIT, CENTRAL SILK BOARD, ROAD NO. 8, PLOT NO. 46-50, KOLHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA, BIDAR- 585 403 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA BHAT M.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CENTRAL SILK BOARD REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY, CSB COMPLEX, BTM LAYOUT, MADIWALA, BENGALURU-560 068. 2. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (A AND A) CENTRAL SERICULTURAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE, CENTRAL SILK BOARD, MYSORE-570 008. 3. SCIENTIST- B, R.E.C. SUB UNIT, CENTRAL SILK BOARD, ROAD NO. 8, PLOT NO. 46-50, KOLHAR INDUSTRAIL AREA, BIDAR-585 403. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NARASIMHA SWAMY, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO(A) ISSUE A WRIT Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28074 WP No. 19694 of 2025 OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE INTIMATION BEARING NO. CSB/RTI/ES/AI/SFW (TS)/2024-2025 DATED 06.01.2025 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F. IN SO FAR AS RELIEVING THE PETITIONER ON 21.07.2025 ON ATTAINING 58 YEARS OF AGE AS THE SAME IS OPPOSED TO THE AWARD DATED 01.04.2013 IN C.R NO. 151/2007 PASSED BY THE CGIT MARKED AT ANNEXURE B AND ALSO SEC.18 (3) (D) OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 AND ARTICLE 14 AND 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER This petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation to continue the petitioner in service under the respondents till the petitioner completes the age of 60 years, which according to the petitioner is the age of superannuation. 2. The petitioner had filed the petition in the light of the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P. No.18693/2014 wherein, in terms of the order dated 04.09.2024, this Court has dismissed the petition filed by first respondent Central Silk Board and confirmed the award - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28074 WP No. 19694 of 2025 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court. 3. In terms of the award dated 01.04.2013, the Tribunal has held that age of superannuation of the Timescale Farm Workers of the respondent establishment would be 60 years and not 55 years as contended by the respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court confirming the award passed by the Tribunal is not questioned by the respondents and it has attained finality. 5. Thus, the learned counsel would submit that the petitioner cannot be superannuated at the age of 58, and the petitioner is entitled to work as the employee of the respondent No.1 till the petitioner completes 60 years. 6. Learned counsel for respondents would submit that though the Board of first respondent has passed a resolution to implement the order, with effect from the date - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28074 WP No. 19694 of 2025 of the order passed in the writ petition, the Board is yet to receive the approval from the Union of India for the decision taken by the Board. It is further submitted that since respondents are awaiting the decision of Union of India, from the perspective of the respondents the award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal has not yet attained finality. 7. This Court has considered the contentions raised at the bar and perused the records. 8. It is not in dispute that the award passed by the Tribunal enhancing the age of retirement to 60 years from 55 years is confirmed by the Division Bench in W.P. No.18693/2014. It is further not in dispute that the petitioner is working as Timescale Farm Workers with the respondent No.1. The petitioner has completed 58 years after the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court confirming the award passed by the Tribunal. 9. This being the position, the award passed by the Tribunal which is confirmed by the Division Bench of this - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28074 WP No. 19694 of 2025 Court comes to the aid of the petitioner and the petitioner is entitled to the following relief:- (i) It is declared that the petitioner's age of superannuation is 60 years. (ii) The respondents shall not superannuate the petitioner treating the age of superannuation as 58. (iii) Thus, the petitioner is entitled to continue in employment as Timescale Farm Workers under first respondent till the age of superannuation at 60 subject to all the Rules and Regulations applicable to the employment of the petitioner. 10. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the above observations and findings. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0