SACHIN KUMAR ALIAS SACHIN MISHRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
BA1/998/2025 · 2025-06-16
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7617 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7617 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
BA1 No. 998 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. N. H. Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the State.
3. Present applicant “Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Mishra, son of Ramakant”, is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 30.01.2025 bearing FIR No. 0044 of 2025, Police Station – Ranipur, District – Haridwar wherein present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 408, 420, 504, 506 of IPC. In this case, after investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the applicant for the offence punishable under Section 408, 504, 506 IPC on 08.04.2025.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that present applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and there is an inordinate delay in lodging the FIR, since, as per FIR, the incident occurred between June, 2023 to November, 2024 and the FIR was lodged on 30.01.2025. He further submits that all the offences are triable to Magistrate.
5. Apart from this, learned counsel for the applicant submits that since charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation and applicant has no previous criminal history.
6. On the other hand, learned AGA has not disputed this fact that all the offences are triable by Magistrate and charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation.
7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation and the applicant has no previous criminal history, therefore, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves for bail.
8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
9. Let the applicant ‘‘Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Mishra, son of Ramakant”, be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
16.06.2025. SKS