Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76165 (PNJ)

SURINDER BERI v. VIJAY SINGH

COCP/2559/2023 · 2025-09-02

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 208 Surinder Beri Vijay Singh, Executive Engineer, Bhakhra Beas Management Board, Bhiwani, Haryana CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) CM-22833 Speaking Order as Annexure R and the Speaking Order is taken on record as Annex COCP-2559 proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 02.3.2023 Court in CWP Haryana and another” vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction to COCP-2559-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-22833-CII- COCP No.2559 of 2023 Date of decision : Surinder Beri Versus Vijay Singh, Executive Engineer, Bhakhra Beas Management Board, Bhiwani, Haryana CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Ms. Sanchi Bindra, Advocate for Mr. Amar Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for the NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) 22833-CII-2023 Prayer in this application is for placing on record THE Speaking Order as Annexure R-1. The application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the Speaking Order is taken on record as Annex 2559-2023 Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 02.3.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-4303-2023 titled as “Surinder B Haryana and another” vide which the petition was disposed of with a direction to “….the Executing Engineer to the effect that in the event 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -2023 in/and 2559 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-02.09.2025 …..Petitioner Vijay Singh, Executive Engineer, Bhakhra Beas Management …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Sanchi Bindra, Advocate for Mr. Amar Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent. Prayer in this application is for placing on record THE The application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the Speaking Order is taken on record as Annexure R-1. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Surinder Beri vs. State of Haryana and another” vide which the petition was disposed of with a “….the Executing Engineer to the effect that in the event VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.03 20.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document of the petitioner filing a fresh representation before him within a period of four weeks from today, speaking order thereupon within a further period of three months thereafter…..” submits that the direction issued vide order dated 02.3.2023 has been complied by passing R-1), pursuant to which the petitioner has already initiated arbitration proceedings and participating in the same; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. passed in the present petition, the same is September 0 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2559-2023 (O & M) of the petitioner filing a fresh representation before him within a period of four weeks from today, he shall pass a reasoned and speaking order thereupon within a further period of three months thereafter…..”. At the very outset learned counsel for the respondent submits that the direction issued vide order dated 02.3.2023 has been complied by passing a Speaking Order dated 17.11.2023 (Annexure 1), pursuant to which the petitioner has already initiated arbitration proceedings and participating in the same; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 02, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 of the petitioner filing a fresh representation before him within a he shall pass a reasoned and speaking order thereupon within a further period of three months At the very outset learned counsel for the respondent submits that the direction issued vide order dated 02.3.2023 has been a Speaking Order dated 17.11.2023 (Annexure 1), pursuant to which the petitioner has already initiated arbitration proceedings and participating in the same; thus, no cause survives in In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.03 20.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document