Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7616 (GAU)

BIPUL DAS AND ANR. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.

WP(C)/991/2018 · 2025-01-28

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010031452018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1003/2018 PRASSANNA DAS S/O- LT PARSHURAM DAS, R/O- GUIJAN, P.O. RANGAGORAH, P.S. TINSUKIA, DIST- TINSUKIA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FOREST DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE RANGE OFFICER SAIKHOWA WILDLIFE DIVISION NABARMURA DHOLLA DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TINSUKIA 4:THE SAIKHOWA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SAIKHOWA P.O. DHOLLA P.S. DHOLLA DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM 5:ROHIT MALLA LESSEE DHOLLA BAZAR P.O. DHOLLA Page No.# 2/4 P.S. DHOLLA DIST- TINSUKIA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A SARMA, MR. K KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Linked Case : WP(C)/991/2018 BIPUL DAS AND ANR. S/O LT. ROBIN DAS R/O TALAP P.O. TALAP P.S. TALAP DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM 2: SHRI CHANDAN MALLA S/O LT. RAICHAND MALLA R/O DHOLLA BAZAR P.O. AND P.S. DHOLLA BAZAR DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FOREST DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE RANGE OFFICER SAIKHOWA WILDLIFE DIVISION NA BARMURA DHOLLA DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Page No.# 3/4 TINSUKIA. 4:THE SAIKHOWA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SAIKHOWA P.O. DHOLLA P.S. DHOLLA DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM 5:SHRI ROHIT MALLA LESSEE DHOLLA BAZAR P.O. DHOLLA P.S. DHOLLA DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. S D PURKAYASTHA Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 29.01.2025 Mr. S. D. Purkayastha, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is under instructions of the petitioner and not to press the writ petition any further and accordingly, he prays that he be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Prayer is not objected to by the learned Counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant