Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76157 (PAT)

Sindhu Devi v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./67886/2025 · 2025-09-24

Partha Sarthy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67886 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sindhu Devi W/O Ram Pukar Singh R/O Ward no. 18, Naula, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Dist.- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 24-09-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending her arrest in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case no. 266 of 2024 registered under sections 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 74, 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the three accused persons including the petitioner herein came variously armed. It is stated that Ram Pukar Singh and his son Prabhat Kumar Singh assaulted with farsa and spear on the informant and the members of his family. It is further stated that the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67886 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 assaulted with a lathi. The informant further states that as a result of assault by Ram Pukar Singh with a farsa, his fua sustained injury on her head. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who happens to be a 45 year old lady has been falsely implicated in the case. Though she has been named in the FIR, however, there is no description whatsoever as to whom she is said to have assaulted. The main allegation of assault is on Ram Pukar Singh and his son. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial. 5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R., the petitioner being a 45 year old lady having no criminal antecedent and there being no description in the FIR as to whom the petitioner was alleged to have assaulted, in the facts of the case, it is directed that the petitioner above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case no. 266 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67886 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai. sauravkrsinha/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T