IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (272) CRM-M-18362-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:-08.07.2026 RAJESH KUMAR @ RAJESH KASHYAP … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Pawan Attri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he intends to withdraw the instant petition at this stage as the petitioner has been acquitted and the present petition has been rendered as infructuous. 2. In view of this, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered as infructuous. 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also dis- posed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 08th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.10 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document