ANITA RANI v. KARAMVIR SAINI INFORMATION COMMISSIONER RTI COMMISSION
COCP/3354/2025 · 2025-08-05
Vikas Bahl
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76138 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76138 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (103) COCP-3354-2025 Date of decision: - 05.08.2025 Anita Rani ....Petitioner Versus Karmvir Saini .....Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. S.K. Liberhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. Present contempt petition has been filed under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for non-compliance of order dated 20.01.2025 (Anenxure P-1) passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
2. Learned State counsel in compliance to the order dated 20.01.2025 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has placed on record a copy of order dated 01.08.2025, which is taken on record and has been marked as 'Mark A'. A copy thereof has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the above, has submitted that the present contempt petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to challenge the said order dated 01.08.2025 in accordance with law, if so adviced.
4.
Disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
( VIKAS BAHL ) August 05, 2025
JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.08.05 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement