Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76137 (PNJ)

GOPAL DASS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

LPA/155/2023 · 2025-03-17

Alok Jain, Lisa Gill

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

228 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-155-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 17, 2025 GOPAL DASS .....Appellant Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. S.K. Choudhary, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** LISA GILL, J. CM-464 & 466-LPA-2023 1. Heard. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the applications as well as arguments addressed, delay of 62 and 177 days in re-filing and filing the appeal, respectively is condoned. 2. Applications are, accordingly, disposed of. CM-465-LPA-2023 1. For the reasons mentioned in the application as well as arguments addressed, leave to file and pursue this appeal without registration as Advocate on Roll, is granted, subject to just exceptions. 2. Application is, accordingly, disposed of. RITU SHARMA 2025.03.25 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA-155-2023 (O&M) -2- LPA-155-2023 1. This appeal has been filed for setting aside order dated 18.02.2022 passed by learned Single Bench whereby CWP-3937-2020 filed by present appellant has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that prayer in writ petition is for directing respondent - Department to allow appellant (writ petitioner) to join his duties by passing appropriate posting orders and release arrears of salary. However, in the interregnum, appellant has attained the age of superannuation. Moreover, Department has also passed an order dismissing him from service. It is, thus, fairly stated that present appeal is practically rendered infructuous, however, appellant seeks liberty to take up all the pleas as may be available and as are raised in present appeal in appropriate proceedings, challenging the order of dismissal. 3. Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous with liberty to appellant as aforementioned. There is no expression of opinion on the merits of the matter. (LISA GILL) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) March 17, 2025 JUDGE Rts Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RITU SHARMA 2025.03.25 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document