Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7613 (KAR)

BHIMAPPA S/O RANGAPPA NAIK v. THE SLAO

MFA/100897/2022 · 2025-01-16

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100897 OF 2022 (LAC) BETWEEN: 1 . BHIMAPPA S/O RANGAPPA NAIK, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, 2 . FAKIRAPPA S/O BALAPPA NAIK, AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, BOTH ARE R/O: HULKUND VILLAGE, TQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELAGAVI- 591114. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. SRINIVAS NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE SLAO RAMESHWAR LIFT IRRIGATION SCHEME, HIDKAL DAM, HIDKAL, TQ. HUKKERI DIST. BELAGAVI -591309. 2 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RAMESHWAR LIFT IRRIGATION SCHEME, KOUJALAGI DIVISION, KOUJALGI, TQ. GOKAK DIST. BELAGAVI -591218. …RESPONDENTS * * * * * 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, against the Judgment dated 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2021 passed in LAC No.1139/2018 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Belagavi. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; O R D E R Three weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the court. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 20.03.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No.100897/2022 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 16.01.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: nth C By: mh