- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29406 RSA No. 1384 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1384 OF 2015 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. K.V. VENKATESHAPPA @ K.VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O NETHI CHINNAPPA @ NETHAPPA, R/O BIKKANAHALLI @ BHOVI BIKKANAHALLI, TAYALUR HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK - 563 131. 2. JAYALAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, D/O LATE SUBBANNA, W/O RATHNAPPA, R/AT K.BIKKANAHALLI, TAYALUR HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK - 563 131. 3. MUNILAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D/O LATE SUBBANNA, W/O THIPPANNA, R/AT BALAJI NAGAR, THIRUPATHI (A.P.) - 517 501. 4. MUNEMMA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, W/O LATE SUBBANNA, R/AT K.BIKKANAHALLI @ BHOVI BIKKANAHALLI, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29406 RSA No. 1384 of 2015 TAYALUR HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK - 563 131. 5. PAPAMMA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, D/O LATE NETHI CHINNAPPA @ NETHAPPA, W/O LATE RAMAPPA, R/AT K.BIKKANAHALLI @ BHOVI BIKKANAHALLI, TAYALUR HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK - 563 131. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KESHAVAMURTHY H B., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMAPPA, R/AT K.BIKKANAHALLI @ BHOVI BIKKANAHALLI, TAYALUR HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK - 563 131. 2. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, W/O HANUMAPPA, R/AT K.BIKKANAHALLI @ BHOVI BIKKANAHALLI, TAYALUR HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK - 563 131. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.V.CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; RESPONDENT NO.2 SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.02.2015 PASSED IN RA.NO.296/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, (ITINERATING AT MULBAGAL). - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29406 RSA No. 1384 of 2015 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL JUDGMENT No representation on behalf of appellant. 2. The matter was passed over and no representation was made on the second time. From the order sheet, it is reflected that the appellant was not represented in the matter on the last six occasions and continuously absent. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30