Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SKN 36-WP-4054.23.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4054 OF 2023 Mr.Mehtab Mumtaz Rehmani. … Petitioner. V/s. The Union of India and another. … Respondents. ______________________ Mr.Agastya Desai with Mrunmayee Kashyap for the Petitioner. Mr.Ram Ochani with Suman Kumar Das for Respondent No.1. Ms.Madhavi H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the Respondent- State. ______________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.
DATE :
14th NOVEMBER 2025. P.C.:- 1) Record indicates that on 21st November 2024 learned A.P.P. appearing for the State had made a statement that the Petitioner has attended the office of G.S.T. pursuant to the summons issued by the concerned Office. The said fact is recorded in para-1 of the Order dated 21st November 2024. On 7th November 2025, learned Advocate for Respondent No.1, on instructions from the concerned Officer made a statement that Respondent No.1 is not contemplating arrest of the Petitioner, as no investigation is being carried out by its Office against M/s.Steel Sea Traders. The said fact is recorded in para-1 of the Order dated 7th November 2025. 1/2 SANJAY KASHINATH NANOSKAR Digitally signed by SANJAY KASHINATH NANOSKAR Date: 2025.11.28 16:00:36 +0530
SKN 36-WP-4054.23.doc 2) In view of the above, Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) and (d).
(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2