Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76120 (KAR)

INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LTD v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7430/2022 · 2025-11-06

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44800 WP No. 7430 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7430 OF 2022 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LTD HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT KANAKAPURA HOSPITAL ROAD, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 562117 BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR.RONY FERNANDES, S/O SANTA BASTYANV FERNANDES, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDAN K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA INSPECTOR OF POLICE KANAKAPURA CIRCLE POLICE STATION, KANAKPURA RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 562117 REPRESENTED BY ITS HOME MINISTRY DEPARTMENT OF HOME AND Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44800 WP No. 7430 of 2022 VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE/DIRECTION DATED 28.03.2022 DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO HANDOVER THE GOLD ORNAMENTS, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AS BAD IN LAW AND ARBITRARY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondent. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the notice dated 28.03.2022 issued by the respondent under S.91 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking information / production of material in respect of the Crime No.35/2022 for the offences - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44800 WP No. 7430 of 2022 punishable under Sections 403, 406, 409, 420, 380 read with S.34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, I am of the view that, since, by the impugned order the respondents have sought certain information by issuing notice at Annexure-A to the petitioner, no interference is called for in this writ petition. However, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent Court in the event, if the petitioner suffers any adverse action by the respondents. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21