AMIT KUMAR AND 29 OTHERS v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/9832/2025 · 2025-07-17
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76115 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76115 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117377 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9832 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amit Kumar And 29 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. At the very outset, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 points out that the petitioners, who are thirty in number, are working as Assistant Teachers in different districts and the concerned District Basic Education Officers have not been arrayed as party respondents. On the aforesaid objection, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file separate writ petitions afresh. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 DS Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad