1 43 APL.102.2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 2018 M/S. Anuj Tex Processors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Applicants Versus Union Territory of Dadra, Nagar Haveli & Ors … Respondents ****** Mr. Dnyaneshwar Deshmukh, for the Applicants. Mr. K. C. Prusty a/w Ms Charmi Shah, for Respondent No.3. Mr. Ashwin Thool a/w Mr. Ayush Singh and Adv. Archishmati Chandramore, for Respondent No.1. ****** CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 24th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C. : . The learned counsel appearing for the applicants and the learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 3 (first informant) jointly submit that the dispute between the parties has been settled and, therefore, the subject FIR could be quashed. 2. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1, i.e. the Union Territory of Dadra, Nagar Haveli, on instructions, makes a statement that “C Summary” has already been filed in this case. 3. This renders the application itself infructuous. 4. Hence the application is disposed of, as such. (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) Rushikesh RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL Digitally signed by RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL Date: 2025.11.25 20:20:02 +0530