IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209 CWP No.3728-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.05.2025 Nachattar Singh and Anr ......Petitioners Versus Union of India and Ors. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present: None for the petitioners. Ms. Gehna Vaishnavi, Advocate for the respondents-UOI. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , J (ORAL) The petitioners in the instant petition are claiming family pension. As per office report, notice issued to respondent No.3 has been received back with the report that “not comes under the jurisdiction of the Court”. It stands noticed that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the 4th time in succession. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in the petition and are not longer interested in pursuing the same. Dismissed for non-prosecution. May 21, 2025 (VINOD S BHARDWAJ) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.05.23 02:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order