Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76083 (KAR)

MRS. KRISHNAVENI v. SHRI C N SURENDRA

RSA/962/2021 · 2025-10-30

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43505 RSA No. 962 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.962 OF 2021 (PAR) BETWEEN: MRS. KRISHNAVENI D/O SHRI A CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A NO.68, GANDHI ROAD RAJAMMA GARDEN, J.P. NAGAR BENGALURU – 560078 …APPELLANT (BY SRI NATARAJ BALLA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI C N SURENDRA S/O LATE CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/A GURUKULA, NAGENAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK & DISTRICT – 561211 2. SHRI C N KUMAR @ NYATHAPPA S/O LATE A CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A GURUKULA, NAGENAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK & DISTRICT-561211 Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43505 RSA No. 962 of 2021 3. MRS. C MAMATHA W/O SHRI VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 4. MR VENKATAPPA S/O LATE AMARAVATHI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 5. KUMARI V SPOORTHI D/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEAR 6. KUMARI V SHRUTHI D/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 7. MASTER V SANTOSH S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESPONDENTS No.3 TO 7 ARE R/AT NO.481, 3RD MAIN, 2ND STAGE, MANJUNATH NAGAR, BANGALORE-560010 8. MR Y VENKTACHALAPATHI S/O LATE Y YAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/A VAPASANDRA 1ST DIVISION CHIKKABALLAPUR TOWN-562101 9. MRS A CHIKKATHAYAMMA @ SMT A RADHA D/O LATE C ADEPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43505 RSA No. 962 of 2021 R/A NO.154, 3RD MAIN, LAKSHMINARAYANAPURA BANGALORE – 560 021 10. MRS M S RADHA W/O C SURENDRA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/A LAKSHMI VENKATESHWAR NILAYA, D NO.350, 2ND CROSS, GOWRIPET KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT-563101 11. MRS VISHALAKSHMAMMA W/O Y VENKATACHALAPAHI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A NO.146, SREE KRISHNANUGRAHA DHAMA WARD NO.2, VAPASANDRA BEHIND CACOON MARKET CHIKKABALLAPUR – 562 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1&10; SRI C SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; MS. SUDHA D, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI N NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R9; SRI G BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE FOR R17; R4 TO R8 & R11 ARE SERVED; SRI JAYASHANKAR R, ADVOCATE FOR P’SD R12 TO R16; SRI S Y SHIVALLI, ADVOCATE FOR P’SD R18 [NOC]) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43505 RSA No. 962 of 2021 DECREE DATED 23.11.2015 PASSED IN O.S.No.180/2003 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKABALLAPUR AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking permission of this Court to with the appeal as not pressed. The memo is taken on record. In view of the said memo, the counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of dismissal of the main appeal, I.As. if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stand dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN