Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76072 (ALL)

NITIN DUTTA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/9865/2025 · 2025-07-24

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:122534 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9865 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nitin Dutta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nand Lal Yadav,Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranesh Dutt Tripathi Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pranesh Dutt Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5 and perused the record. 2. The instant petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with following prayers:- "A. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the salary of Headmaster as he had performed the duties of In- charge Headmaster in Upper Primary School situated at Village- Adrauna, Block- Ramkola, District- Kushinagar for more than 2 years and further be pleased to direct the Respondent no.4 to decide the representation dated 11.06.2025 within stipulated period." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of his grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. 4. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5 submits that in case petitioner moves fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.4 within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.4 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 25.7.2025/Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad