VIJAYAN ARUMUGAM AND ORS. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS.
WP/2585/2018 · 2025-11-04
Shri Shyam C Chandak, Smt Bharati Dangre
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76071 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76071 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
hcs 1/2 23.w2585.18.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2585 OF 2018 Vijayan Arumugam and Ors. … Petitioners V/s. Deputy Commissioner of Police & Ors. … Respondents Ms. Reshma Ravi i/b K. P. Ravi for the Petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta D. Shinde APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE &
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 4th NOVEMBER, 2025 P.C:- 1) Heard Counsel for the Petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. 2) Petitioner No.1, who is the husband of Respondent No.4 is aggrieved by issuance of a notice by Mahila Takrar Nivaran Kaksh, Kalyan Vibhag securing his presence on 1/05/2018 in the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone III as a complaint is received by his wife Sou.Rajeshwari Arumugam. The Notice being issued in 2018 directed his presence on a particular date and this is a subject matter of the Petition which is filed on 30th April, 2018. Down the line on passing of seven years, we not deem it HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2025.11.07 17:33:48 +0300
hcs 2/2 23.w2585.18.doc appropriate not to entertain the Petition which only raises a challenge to a notice directing his presence in the office of the notice giver on a stipulated date. 3) In the wake of the aforesaid, since we are of the view that the Petition has being rendered infructuous, since the Petitioner has either attended or not attended but the proceedings must have been taken due course of action, we dispose of the Petition.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.)