Deo Kumar Tiwari v. The State of Bihar through Sri Santosh Kumar Mall,
MJC/2504/2025 · 2026-08-20
Rajiv Roy
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7607 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7607 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2504 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2907 of 2025 ====================================================== Deo Kumar Tiwari son of Late Deo Narayan Tiwari, Resident of Mohalla- Kuraich (Mahavir Asthan), near Canal Gali No.16, Ward No.05, Police Station- Sasaram, District-Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Sri Santosh Kumar Mall, fathers name not known, Principle Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. Sri Santosh Kumar Mall father's name not known The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. Smt. Udita Singh, fathers name not known, The District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram.
4. The Nagar Nigam Sasaram through Sri Vikash Kumar, fathers name not known, its Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Sasaram.
5. Sri Vikash Kumar fathers name not known, The Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Sasaram, District-Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Choubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Standing Counsel 21 For the O.P. Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. Bajrani Lal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 20-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):
“for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 20.02.2025 passed in CWJC No. 2907 of 2025.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he
Patna High Court MJC No.2504 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2026 2/2 may be granted liberty to agitate the matter in accordance with law.
4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U