Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 235
Neha
State of Haryana and others
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari dated 14.01.2025 and the Final Result dated 05.02.2025, whereby the petitioner's candidature under the EWS category for the post of Ayurvedic Medical Officer (Group petitioner also seeks issuance of a writ of respondents to consider her candidature under the EWS category by completing the selection process, including interview, placing her in the waiting/select list as per merit, and granting all consequential benefits.
very fairly submits that the issue involved i CWP-9150-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9150 of 2025
Date of decision : Versus State of Haryana and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the Announcement dated 13.01.2025, Letter dated 14.01.2025 and the Final Result dated 05.02.2025, whereby the petitioner's candidature under the EWS category for the post of Ayurvedic Medical Officer (Group-B) has been rejected. The petitioner also seeks issuance of a writ of respondents to consider her candidature under the EWS category by completing the selection process, including interview, placing her in the waiting/select list as per merit, and granting all consequential
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submits that the issue involved i
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9150 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-08.07.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sumit Sangwan, Advocate Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of for quashing the Announcement dated 13.01.2025, Letter dated 14.01.2025 and the Final Result dated 05.02.2025, whereby the petitioner's candidature under the EWS category for the post of B) has been rejected. The petitioner also seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider her candidature under the EWS category by completing the selection process, including interview, placing her in the waiting/select list as per merit, and granting all consequential At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submits that the issue involved in the present matter has VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.10 18.59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
been decided against the petitioner vide Division Bench judgment of this Court in LPA commission vs. Pardeep Kumar and others”, decided on 03.11.2025 and the SLP against the said judgment has also been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. to be correct; and accordingly prays that the present writ petition be dismissed.
dismissed
July 08, 202 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
CWP-9150-2025 (O&M) been decided against the petitioner vide Division Bench judgment of this Court in LPA-1397-2025 titled as “Haryana Public Service commission vs. Pardeep Kumar and others”, decided on 03.11.2025 and the SLP against the said judgment has also been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Learned State counsel affirms the above stated position to be correct; and accordingly prays that the present writ petition be dismissed. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. , 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 been decided against the petitioner vide Division Bench judgment of 2025 titled as “Haryana Public Service commission vs. Pardeep Kumar and others”, decided on 03.11.2025; and the SLP against the said judgment has also been dismissed by the Learned State counsel affirms the above stated position to be correct; and accordingly prays that the present writ petition be the present writ petition stands Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.10 18.59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document