Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76041 (MAD)

KEDHARNATH v. State , Inspector of Police

CRL RC/1281/2025 · 2025-08-01

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.R.C No.1281 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date : 01.08.2025 CORAM: THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.R.C No.1281 of 2025 and Crl.M.P No.14818 of 2025 Kedharnath ... Petitioner ..Vs. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police T1, Tambaram Police Station Chennai-600 045. ... Respondent Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 438 read with Section 442 of BNSS Act, to set aside the order dated 12.02.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chengalpattu in Crl.M.P No.17 of 2024 in SC No.105 of 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Janakiram For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C No.1281 of 2025 O R D E R This revision has been filed as against the order passed in Crl.M.P No.27 of 2024 in S.C No.105 of 2023, dated 12.02.2025 thereby dismissed the petition filed seeking for supplying of charge sheet in translated version in vernacular language i.e. Telegu. 2. The petitioner is arrayed as 1st accused in S.C.No.105 of 2023. He did not know the language of Tamil. He knows only Telegu and he is from Andhra Pradesh. Therefore, before framing of charges, the petitioner filed a petition seeking the charge sheet in a vernacular language i.e. Telegu. However, it was dismissed on the ground that the counsel who appeared on behalf of the petitioner knows Tamil and also Telegu. Further, the petitioner can also able to understand a little bit of Tamil language and he is able to give instructions to his counsel to defend his case. 3. In view of the above, this Court is inclined to set aside the order passed by the trial Court and direct the trial Court to furnish the chargesheet in translated version in vernacular language to the petitioner i.e Telegu. It is made also clear that the trial Court has framed charges 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C No.1281 of 2025 and as such, no need to frame another charge. The trial Court is also directed to serve a copy of the charges in Telegu and proceed with the trial. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision is allowed and the order dated 12.02.2025 passed in Crl.M.P No.17 of 2024 in S.C No.105 of 2023 by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chengalpattu, is hereby set aside. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. . 01.08.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No uma To 1. The Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chengalpattu 2. The Inspector of Police T1, Tambaram Police Station Chennai-600 045. 3.The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C No.1281 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J uma Crl.R.C No.1281 of 2025 and Crl.M.P No.14818 of 2025 01.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis