Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76034 (KAR)

SRI V SUBBA RAO v. JABM ONE SOURCE PVT LTD

RFA/691/2024 · 2025-08-28

K S Hemalekha

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33289 RFA No. 691 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.691 OF 2024 (RES) BETWEEN: SRI V. SUBBA RAO S/O SRI SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.46, ADARSH SERENITY, 3RD LANE, GROUND FLOOR, VYDEHI CLINIC, KANNAMANGALA, KADUGODI, BENGALURU-560067. …APPELLANT (BY SRI PRAMODA GOWDA T.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. JABM ONE SOURCE PVT. LTD., 2ND MAIN ROAD, NILA INVESTMENT LAYOUT, BETTADASANAPURA, ELECTRONIC CITY PHASE, BENGALURU-560 100. REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR A SUNIL MORE SHIVAJI RAO, B. RVSN ANE RAM TEJA ARIGEIA. 2. S. NAVEEN KUMAR S/O SRI SRINIVASAN .R AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT A-403, AMRUTHA GRANDEUR, RECHANAHALLI ROAD, DR. SRK NAGAR POST, THANISANDRA, BENGALURU-560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAYAKUMAR N.D., ADVOCATE FOR R-2; NOTICE TO R-1 IS DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED 02/04/2024) Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33289 RFA No. 691 of 2024 THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.02.2024. PASSED ON IA NO.III IN O.S.NO.7640/2022 ON THE FILE OF 39TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, ALLOWING IA NO.III FILED U/O VII RULE 11 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant files memo, which reads as under: “The appellant prays this Hon’ble Court be please permit the appellant to withdraw above appeal as ‘not pressed’ and kindly direct the office to return entire court fee to appellant, in the interest of justice.” 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of memo, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Registry to return the Court fee to the appellant in accordance with law. Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6