Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76030 (ALL)

SUNDAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/9986/2025 · 2025-07-27

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:124179 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9986 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sundar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the Joint Director of Education, Agra Region, Agra/respondent no. 2 to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law as well as in furtherance to the report submitted by the DIOS, Mathura dated 25.06.2025 on the claim of the petitioner in respect of transfer from Sri Adarsh Inter College, Rasoolpur Chauraha, Jajanpatti, Mathura to Rashtriya Inter College, Goverdhan, Mathura within stipulated period." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the proposal sent by the District Inspector of Schools, Mathura (Annexure - 8 to the writ petition) is pending before the Joint Director of Education, Agra Region, Agra and he may be directed to decide the claim of the petitioner in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Jitendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Respondent no.2, Joint Director of Education, Agra Region, Agra is directed to decide the claim of the petitioner (Annexure No.8 of the writ petition) in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad