Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76025 (KAR)

SMT. RENUKA B K v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/31094/2025 · 2025-10-23

M Nagaprasanna, R Devdas

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41871-DB WP No. 31094 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 31094 OF 2025 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RENUKA B K W/O. K. CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO. 10, RENAISSANCE PROSPORO, NEAR PROLIFE HOSPITAL, BELLARI ROAD, BYATARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU-560 092. 2. SMT. MUNITHAYAMMA D/O. LATE BYANNA, W/O. PATALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/AT JINKEBACCHAHALLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN CODE-560049. 3. ANAND GOWDA. H S/O. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA @ SMT. LATE NANJAMMA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT JINKEBACCHAHALLI, Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41871-DB WP No. 31094 of 2025 DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN CODE-560 049. 4. GOWRAMMA D/O. LATE BYANNA, W/O. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 6O YEARS, R/AT ITTAGALPURA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, PIN CODE-560 064. 5. SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA D/O. LATE BYANNA, W/O. PILLANNA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT VADARAHALLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, PIN CODE-560064. 6. SMT. NAGAMMA D/O. LATE BYANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT THIMMAJJANAHALLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN CODE-560 049. 7. ASHWATHAIAH S/O. LATE BYANNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NAGENAHALLI, YALAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, PIN CODE-560 064. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41871-DB WP No. 31094 of 2025 8. NARAYANASWAMY S/O. LATE HUCHHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT ANDRAHALLI VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN CODE-562 110. 9. SMT. INDIRA W/O. MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT ANDRAHALLI VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN CODE-562 110. 10. SMT. SHWETHA W/O. MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT ANDRAHALLI VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN CODE-562 110. 11. SHIVARAJ KUMAR S/O NARAYANASWAMY AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS R/A SADAHALLIL KVILLAGE DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENFALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN CODE 562110 12. SHANKARAPPA S/O PUTTANNA AGE ABOUT 80 YEARS - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41871-DB WP No. 31094 of 2025 13. VIJAYAMMA W/O LATE ASHOK AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS 14. BHAVANA D/O LATE ASHOK AGE ABOUT 28 YEARS 15. ANKITHA D/O LATE ASHOK AGE ABOUT 26 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.12 TO 15 ARE R/A ARADESHANAHALI DEVANAHALLITALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PINCODE 562110 16. SMT SHYLAJA W/O ASHOK AGE ABOUT 51 YEARS 17. ABHILASH S/O KASHOK AGE ABOUT 32 YEARS PETITIONER NO. 16 & 17 ARE R/A GALIBILIKOTE DODDABELAVANGALA HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 18. SMT A S ANITHA D/O SHANKARAPPA P AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41871-DB WP No. 31094 of 2025 R/A SUSHMITHA FANCY STORE THOLACHINAGUPPE VILLAGE NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 19. SMT SAROJAMMA W/O ASHWATHAIAH AGE ABOUT 61 YEARS 20. VINAY KUMAR A S/O ASHWATHAIAH AGE ABOUT 47 YEARS 21. SMT SNEHA L W/O VINAY KUMAR A AGE ABOUT 37 YEARS 22. VISHWAS N A S/O ASHWATHAIAH AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS 23. SMT CHANDANA B R W/O VISHWAS N A AGE ABOUT 34 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.19 TO 23 ARE R/A NO E 162, NAGENAHALLI VILLAGE SINGANAVAKANAHALLI POST YELAHANKA, BENGALURU 560064. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAVIKUMAR G H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41871-DB WP No. 31094 of 2025 REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.RAJAKUMAR., AGA FOR R1 SRI. SHIVAPRASAD.M. SHANTANAGOUDAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT No-2 AND 3 TO GIVE THE COMPENSATION BY WAY OF ALLOTTING THE DEVELOPED LAND/ SITES UNDER 60.40 SCHEME TO THE PETITIONER No-1 IN TERMS OF COMPROMISED DECREE PASSED IN OS-48/2017 IN THE PETITIONERS LAND IN Sy No-68/1 AVALAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI YELAHANKA TALUK OR NEIGHBOURING LAND AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41871-DB WP No. 31094 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayers: (i) Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the Respondent No.2 and 3 to give the compensation by way of allotting the developed land/sites under 60:40 scheme to the Petitioner No.1 in terms of Compromised Decree passed in O.S.48/2017 in the petitioner’s land in Sy.No.68/1, Avalahalli Vilalge, Yalahanka Hobli Yalahanka Taluk or neighbouring land. (ii) Issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the Respondent No.2 and 3 to allot sites to third parties only after giving the compensation to the petitioner No.1 by way of allotting the sites of the petitioner’s choice under 60:40 scheme in the petitioner’s land itself. (iii) Grant any other relief/reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to the ends of justice. - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41871-DB WP No. 31094 of 2025 2. This Court in terms of the order dated 24.09.2025 passed in W.A.No.252/2017 had permitted the Bangalore Development Authority to entertain the applications of land losers for allotment of sites. The present petitioners are also seeking the same prayers with regard to allotment of site. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Bangalore Development Authority submits that in view of the status- quo order operating in all these cases no further steps were taken and now that this Court had permitted the Bangalore Development Authority to entertain the applications of the land losers and sites to be allotted to the land losers. The case of the petitioners is also to be taken up and grievance of the petitioners is to be redressed. 4. In the light of the submissions of the learned counsels, we are of the opinion that matter could be disposed of, with a direction to the Bangalore Development Authority to take necessary steps in regard - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41871-DB WP No. 31094 of 2025 to the grievance of the petitioner, in accordance with the scheme without brooking any further delay and at any rate within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KLY CT: JL