WP Crl. No. 920 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 920 of 2025 V.Karuppusamy S/o.Late Vengidusamy Gounder, Thottathusalai, Dana, Tammampathi Road, Vettaikaranpudur-642 129, Anaimalai Taluk, Coimbatore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Coimbatore-641 018. 2. The Superintendent of Police (Rural), State Bank Road, Coimbatore. 3. The Sub Collector, Pollachi, Coimbatore District. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Valparai, amp at Anaimalai, Coimbatore District. 5. The Inspector of Police, Anaimalai, Coimbatore District. 6. The Sub Inspector of Police, Anaimalai, Coimbatore District. 7. Muthukrishnan S/o.Aruchamy, 3/3, Mudaliar Street,Vettaikaranpudur, Anaimalai Taluk,Coimbatore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 920 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 6 8. Selvanayagam W/o.Kumar, 3/3, Mudaliar Street, Vettaikaranpudur, Anaimalai Taluk, Coimbatore District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition Criminal filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 4th respondent to implement the order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 29.07.2025 in Oo.Mu.No.2028/2025 A1 based on the representation dated 05.04.2025 sent by the petitioner within a stipulated time. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Veeraraghavan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar for R1 to R6 Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Crl.Side) Mr.S.Arjun for R7 and R8 O R D E R This Petition has been filed to direct the 4th respondent to implement the order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 29.07.2025 in Oo.Mu.No.2028/2025 A1 based on the representation dated 05.04.2025 sent by the petitioner within a stipulated time. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 6 and the learned counsel for the respondents 7 and 8. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 920 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 6 3. On perusing the entire documents placed on record, it is seen that the petitioner is the maternal uncle of the respondents 7 and 8 and the petitioner owned the agricultural property situated in S.F.No.334 to an extent of 6.92 acres, Vettaikarapudur Village, Ananaimalai Taluk. Since the petitioner had no issues, the 7th respondent is living along with the petitioner. However, the 7th respondent dispossessed the petitioner from petitioner’s land and failed to maintain the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner approached the 3rd respondent under Section 23 of the Maintenance of Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. After due enquiry, the 3rd respondent, passed an order by restraining the respondents 7 and 8 herein from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the subject land and further observed that if any violation occurs, the concerned jurisdictional police was directed to take appropriate action as against them. 4. It is to be noted that now, once again, the petitioner was restrained by the respondents 7 and 8 from his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject land. Though the petitioner lodged a complaint, no action has been taken as against the respondents 7 and 8 herein. 5. It is the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 7 and 8 that already in this regard, suit is pending. The 7th https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 920 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 6 respondent filed a suit as against the petitioner for declaration and it is pending in O.S.No.563 of 2025 on the file of learned IV Additional District Court, Coimbatore. He further submitted that the 8th respondent also purchased some part of the property and also filed O.S.No.577 of 2025 for declaration and injunction on the file of the IV Additional District Court, Coimbatore and it is also pending. 6. It is to be noted that mere pendency of the suits would not preclude the 4th respondent from taking action as against the respondents 7 and 8, therefore, the 4th respondent is directed to comply with the order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 29.07.2025 in Oo.Mu.No.2028/2025 dated 05.04.2025 and if any complaint has been lodged by the petitioner, the respondents 4 and 5 are directed to take appropriate action as against the respondents 7 and 8 herein in accordance with law. With the above observation, the present Petition is disposed of. No costs. 29-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 920 of 2025 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1. The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Coimbatore-641 018. 2. The Superintendent of Police (Rural), State Bank Road,Coimbatore. 3. The Sub Collector, Pollachi,Coimbatore District. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Valparai,Camp at Anaimalai, Coimbatore District. 5. The Inspector of Police, Anaimalai,Coimbatore District. 6. The Sub Inspector of Police, Anaimalai, Coimbatore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 920 of 2025 __________ Page6 of 6 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. ssd WP Crl. No. 920 of 2025 29-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis