Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.11009 of 2025
Nasiruddin Khan … Petitioner
Mr. D.R.Parida, Advocate
-versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. R.B.Mishra, Addl. PP
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER(ORAL) 20.11.2025
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
2. This is an application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Soro P.S. Case No.208 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No.487 of 2025 pending in the file of learned JMFC, Hatadihi, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 310(2) of BNS, on the main allegation of committing robbery of 30Kgs of copper electric wire and taking it in a Pickup Van bearing Regd. No. OD-01-A-5248.
3. Heard, Mr. Deepak Ranjan Parida, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.B.Mishra, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. On being queried about the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, Mr. Parida volunteers to withhold bail to the petitioner, if he is found to have any criminal antecedent. p. 2
4. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-a-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the Petitioner in custody since 29.09.2025 with substantial progress in investigation and keeping in view the other circumstance on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits the petitioner to bail.
5. Hence, the bail application of the Petitioner stands allowed and the Petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following condition:- (i) the petitioner shall appear before the IO as and when required for the purpose of investigation till submission of charge sheet.
In view of the specific submission as advanced for the petitioner, the benefit of this order shall not be extended to the petitioner, if he is found to have any criminal antecedent. p. 3
6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.
(G. Satapathy)
Judge kishore