[2025:RJ-JP:19616] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 85/2013 Nand Kishore Koolwal son of Sh. Radhakishan Koolwal, aged 65 years, resident of Near Diggi Malpura Gate, Town & Tehsil Sanganer Dist-Jaipur ----Appellant Versus M/s Sita Ram Giriraj Prasad Maheshwari, trhough proprietor Shri Giriraj Prasad S/o Shri Badrinarayan, resident of Shop No. 4, near Diggi-Maplura Gate, Town & Tehsil-Sanganer, Dist-Jaipur ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 83/2013 Nand Kishore Koolwal son of Sh. Radhakishan Koolwal, aged 65 years, resident of Near Diggi Malpura Gate, Town & Tehsil Sanganer Dist-Jaipur ----Appellant Versus M/s Maheshwari Kirana Store, through proprietor Shri Om Prakash son of Shri Ramvilash, resident of shop No. 1, near Diggi-Malpura Gate, Town & Tehsil-Sanganer, Dist-Jaipur ----Respondent S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 84/2013 Nand Kishore Koolwal son of Sh. Radhakishan Koolwal, aged 65 years, resident of Near Diggi Malpura Gate, Town & Tehsil Sanganer Dist-Jaipur ----Appellant Versus M/s Maheshwari Kirana Store, through proprietor Shri Om Prakash son of Shri Ramvilash, resident of shop No. 1, near Diggi-Malpura Gate, Town & Tehsil-Sanganer, Dist-Jaipur ----Respondent S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 86/2013 Nand Kishore Koolwal son of Sh. Radhakishan Koolwal, aged 65 years, resident of Near Diggi Malpura Gate, Town & Tehsil Sanganer Dist-Jaipur [2025:RJ-JP:19616] (2 of 2) [CSA-85/2013] ----Appellant Versus M/s Sita Ram Giriraj Prasad Maheshwari, trhough proprietor Shri Giriraj Prasad S/o Shri Badrinarayan, resident of Shop No. 4, near Diggi-Maplura Gate, Town & Tehsil-Sanganer, Dist-Jaipur ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. M C Gupta, Adv. for Mr. G P Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma Saraswat, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 09/05/2025 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondents have handed over the vacant and peaceful possession of the premises to the landlord. So, these civil second appeals have been rendered infructuous. So, these civil second appeals are accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) dismissed. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Tahir/117-120