ABHIMANYU SINGH SHAKTAWAT v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
APEAL/926/2025 · 2025-10-17
Shri S M Modak
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76009 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76009 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
907. Appeal 926 of 2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 926 OF 2025 Abhimanyu Singh Shaktawat ...Appellant Vs. State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 18072 OF 2025 Kratika Abhimanyu Shaktawat And Anr ...Appellants Vs. The State of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents ***** Adv. Pratik Deshmukh Advocate for the Appellants Adv. Piyush Toshnival i/by Adv. Ashish Pawar Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 *****
CORAM :
S. M. MODAK, J.
DATE :
17th OCTOBER 2025 P. C. :-
1. Today all the Appellants are present and the first informant- Respondent No. 2 is present. The Parties have already executed Consent terms. It is taken on record on 14.10.2025. The Respondent Seema 1/3 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2025.10.18 18:14:50 +0530
907. Appeal 926 of 2025.doc No. 2 has issued demand draft in favour of the Appellant-Abhimanyu. It is tendered in the Court on the last date.
2. Today the Appellants have handed over keys of the entire building to the Respondent No. 2-first informant. It is accepted by the first informant. It is submitted on behalf of the Appellants that they have removed all the articles, furniture from the entire building.
3. Both of them have submitted that they will abide remaining terms of the consent terms by taking appropriate steps. The Respondent No. 2 is aware about removing article and furniture. Ultimately, both of them have settled the issue of the possession in between them. Both of them have agreed for filing quashing petitions. All the F.I.R.s lodged by both of them against each other. Both of them have agreed to give consent for quashing of the F.I.R. lodged against each other. The demand draft is handed over to the Appellant- Abhimanyu Singh Shaktawat. It is also submitted that leave and license agreement is also cancelled mutually by both of them.
4. In view of that these appeals can be disposed of. Till the time, the present F.I.R. is there, the Appellants need to be protected from the arrest. Hence, the following order is passed:- Seema 2/3
907. Appeal 926 of 2025.doc
ORDER (i) Both appeals are disposed of as settled. (ii) In case of arrest in connection with C. R. No. 160 of 2025 registered with Kharadi Police Station, Pune, for the offence punishable under Sections 74, 115 (1), 115(2), 318 (4), 351 (1), 351 (2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Sections 3 (1)(g), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3 (1)(u), 3(1)(v), 3 (1)(w)(ii), 3(1)(zc) and 3 (2)(va), the Appellant-Abhimanyu Singh Shaktawat in Criminal Appeal No. 926 of 2025 and Appellants-Kratika Abhimanyu Shaktawat and Abhilasha Shaktawat in Criminal Appeal (ST) No. 18072 of 2025 be released on bail on furnishing Personal bond and Surety bond of Rs. 15,000/- each. (iii) All Appellants to co-operate the Police as and when required.
5. Pending Interim Application, if any, also stands disposed of.
[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 3/3