- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26733 RSA No. 1919 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1919 OF 2012 (DEC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. R VAIDYA RANI W/O SRI. VENUGOPAL, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO. 158, 7TH CROSS, NAVILU ROAD, KUVEMPUNAGAR, CHAMARAJA MOHALLA, MYSORE-02. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. VAIDYA RANI, ADVOCATE(ABSENT)) AND: 1. KEMPEGOWDA MAJOR, S/O KARI SIDDEGOWDA, R/AT DOOR NO. 2706, MEDARAKKERI, I CROSS, CHAMUNDIPURAM, MYSORE-05. 2. 2(a) M N MALURU SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR's SMT. NAYANA D/O LATE M.N. MALURU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO. 265, PACCHE 7TH CROSS, GOKULAM III STAGE. Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26733 RSA No. 1919 of 2012 2(b) MYSORE-570 002. SRI. VINAY S/O LATE M.N. MALURU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO. 265, PACCHE, 7TH CROSS, GOKULAM III STAGE MYSORE-570 002. 3. 3(a) 3(b) KARUNA N MALURU SINCE DEAD BY LR's SMT. NAYANA D/O LATE M.N. MALURU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO. 265, PACCHE 7TH CROSS, GOKULAM III STAGE MYSORE-570 002. SRI. VINAY S/O LATE M.N. MALURU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO. 265, PACCHE, 7TH CROSS, GOKULAM III STAGE MYSORE-570 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHOWRI H.R. ,ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. J.M. ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2(a), R2(b), R3(a) AND R3(b) THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 23.6.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.1041/2010 ON THE FILE OF PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-II, MYSORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 18.2.2010 PASSED IN OS.NO.1157/2007 ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL I CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC, MYSORE AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26733 RSA No. 1919 of 2012 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to retire from the case. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Counsel for the appellant is permitted to retire from the case. 4. Appeal is of the year 2012. None appears for the appellant. No grounds to adjourn the matter. 5. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE RU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38