IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2890/2025 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 03.03.2025 CWP No. 2890/2025 Gopal Singh …Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. .…Respondents. CWP No. 2896/2025 Prem Kumar …Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Ms. Anchal, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent(s): Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. These writ petitions have been filed for the grant of almost common substantive reliefs. Relief clause herein is extracted from CWP No. 2890/2025:- “ a) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing respondent corporation regularize services of the petitioner from his initial date of appointment and treat petitioner 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 as appointee on regular appointee with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice. b) That or in alternative, the respondent corporation may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioners immediately after one year, by modifying regularization order Annexure P-2, with all consequential benefits in view of judgment by this Hon'ble Court in case CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020 titled as Vikram Singh versus HRTC and others.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the issue involved and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner has already been adjudicated in Vikram Singh Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) states that the petitioner(s) would be content, if the cases of the petitioner(s), are considered by the respondents, in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time-bound schedule. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matters, the instant petitions are disposed of by directing the respondent(s) to consider the cases of the petitioner(s) in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner(s). 21CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020 decided on 09.11.2023. 3 Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 03rd March, 2025(rohit)