Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75978 (KAR)

SRI RAVI R N ALIAS MALLESHA v. SMT. SHIVALEELA

WP/13776/2023 · 2025-07-23

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29076 WP No. 13776 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 13776 OF 2023 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI RAVI R N ALIAS MALLESHA S/O SRI. NINGAPPPA N. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO 655, SRI PATHALINGESHWARA NILAYA, 5TH CROSS, NEAR ANJINEYA TEMPLE, ANJANEYA BADAVANE, DAVANAGERE -577004 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR V.H., ADVOCATE) (ABSENT) AND: SMT. SHIVALEELA W/O SRI. RAVI R.N. ALIAS MALLESHA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO. 3084/7, M.C.C B BLOCK, 4TH CROSS, DAVANAGERE-577002 …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C. IN CRL.MISC.NO.209/2022 DATED 13.10.2022 PASSED BY THE ADDL. FAMILY COURT JUDGE AT DAVANAGERE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29076 WP No. 13776 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the order dated 13.10.2022 passed in Crl.Misc.No.209/2022 by the Judge, Family Court, Davanagere, whereby the respondent/husband was directed to pay maintenance of an amount of Rs.3,000/- to petitioner No.1 therein and Rs.2,500/- each to petitioner Nos.2 and 3 therein. This is the Writ Petition is 2023. The matter was listed once on 11.05.2023, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter is still pending for compliance of the office objections. For non- compliance of office objections, the matter was listed on 22.07.2025. On that day, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29076 WP No. 13776 of 2023 Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25