HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22999 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and direct the concern respondents to conduct the re-enquiry commission for committing the offence of irregularity and illegality by the Respondent no. 5,6 and 7 in the better treatment of the son namely Lakshya Pandey of the petitioner. (ii). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and direct the respondent no.3 to decide the representation dated 23-06- 2025 moved by petitioner with specific and reasoned order. (iii). Issue any suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the instant case. (iv). Award the costs of the petition to the Petitioner." 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier an enquiry was conducted on the application of the petitioner, in which respondent nos. 5 to 7 have been absolved. It is contended that the enquiry was not conducted as per law inasmuch as the Enquiry Committee did not consider the evidence and other material produced by the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey, Somendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Kumar Singh, C.S.C., K.K.Rao Krishnanand Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Be that as it may, the petitioner has not challenged the earlier enquiry report in the present petition, so the fact as to whether earlier enquiry conducted by the respondent was not in accordance with the procedure contemplated under law or there is some infirmity and irregularity in the enquiry cannot be considered. In the absence of challenge to the earlier enquiry report, this Court cannot issue a direction for re-enquiry since the petitioner has not challenged the earlier enquiry report which is in favour of the respondent nos. 5 to 7. Therefore, we are not inclined to grant any relief as prayed for by the petitioner in the present petition. 5. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. September 18, 2025 NS WRIC No. 22999 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad