APHC010077922020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4644/2020 Between: 1. S.PULLAIAH, S/O. PULLAIAH, AGED 48 YEARS, AUTHORISED PERSON, BERACAH PRAYER HOUSE, R/O. D.NO. 13-2-374, RAMACHANDRANAGAR, ANANTAPURAMU 2. D.KUMAR, S/O. JOSEPH, AGED 56 YEARS, RESPONSIBLE BROTHER, BERACAH PRAYER HOUSE, R/O. TAILORS COLONY, TADIPATRI, ANANTAPURAMU DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADIPATRI POLICE STATION, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. MR SIDDATEJA MURTHY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, AGED - MAJOR, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TADIPATRI TOWN POLICE STATION, TADIPATRI, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. MR K JASHUA JABEZ, S/O. DONALAD, 38 YEARS R/O. KUTAGULLA VILLAGE, KADIRI MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT 5. R VICTOR DAVID, S/O. VEERAIAH, 75 YEARS, R/O. ANNATAPURAMU TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A VARALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in directing the petitioners not to install CC cameras in the Beracah Prayer House (Church) situated D.No. 13-917-7, Road No. 3, Sanjeev Nagar, Tadipatri Town, Anantapuramu District at the behest of the respondents 4 and 5 who were illegally interfering with the smooth conduct of affairs of the Church by calling the petitioners over phone to the station and directing to settle out the disbutes with the respondents 4 and 5 or else he would foist false cases against the Petitioners, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under the Constitution of India.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.A.Varalakshmi, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that no further orders are required in this matter as the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.4644 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh