- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36423 RFA No. 414 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 414 OF 2008 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT ANUSUYAMMA SINCE DEAD REP BY HER LR’S 2. SRI M SATYANARAYANA S/O LATE D MOHANRAM AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 3. SRI M JAYAKUMAR SINCE DEAD REP BY HIS LR’S 3(A) SMT MEEN KUMARI W/OLATE SRI M JAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 3(B) SMT LAKSHMI D/O LAE SRI M JAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEAR 3(C) SMT HARI PRIYA S/O LAE SRI M JAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 3(D) SRI YUGNDHAR S/O LATE SRI M JAYAKUMAR ALL RESIDING AT 3RD CRSS SHIVAJI ROAD NEW KORACHARAPALYA ‘A’ STREET BLACKPALLY, CIVIL STATION, BANGALORE-560051. …APPELLANTS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36423 RFA No. 414 of 2008 (BY SRI.M SATYANARAYANA AND OTHERS - NO REPRESENTATION) AND: 1. SMT PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE M MANOHAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2. M SRINATH S/O LATE M MANOHAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 3. M THULASI D/O LATE M MANOHAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R1 TO R3 AE R/AT QUARTERS NO 2 BLOCK 11 BLACKPALLY POLICE QUARTERS BROADWAY ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR BANGALORE 51. 4. SMT M MOHAN A D/O LATE M MANOHAR W/O JOHN PAUL AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NO 4, 3 CROSS, NK PALYA SHIVAJINAGAR, BALAPPA GARDEN BANGALORE-51. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. L NARASIMHAMURTHY, AND SRI.S A SUDHINDRA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:29.11.2007 PASSED IN OS.NO.8181/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, CCH.NO.2, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION, SEPARATE POSSESSION AND MESNE PROFITS, HOLDING THAT THE PLAINTIFFS ARE TOGETHER ENTITLED TO 1/4TH SHARE AND ITS SEPARATE POSSESSION IN THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTIES. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36423 RFA No. 414 of 2008 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT This Court, on 15.02.2023, permitted the learned counsel for the appellants to retire from the case and directed the office to show the name of the appellants in the cause list. 2. Today, when the matter is called, neither the appellants are present nor engaged any counsel. 3. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting this appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 49