SUYOG TELEMATICS LIMITED, THR. DIRECTOR MR. SHIVSHANKAR LATURE v. THE ASST. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER (BUILDING AND FACTORY DEPARTMENT) AND OTHERS
IA/4346/2021 · 2025-11-07
Shri Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75966 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75966 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
4-ao-529-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.529 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4346 OF 2021 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.529 OF 2021 Suyog Telematics Limited .. Appellant. v/s. The Asstt. Municipal Commissioner, (Building and Factory Department) & Others .. Respondents. None for the Appellant. Adv. Neeta Jadhav i/b. Adv. Komal Punjabi, for the Respondent-BMC.
CORAM: FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA,J.
DATE : 7th NOVEMBER, 2025.
P. C:- 1 By an Order dated 13th October, 2025, it was recorded that none had appeared on behalf of the Appellant. It was also recorded that the Registry to intimate the Appellant’s Advocate about the next date of hearing and the matter was listed today for dismissal. 2 By a letter dated 31st October, 2025, the Registry has intimated the Appellant’s Advocate about the next date of hearing. 3 Despite the same, no one appears on behalf of the Appellant even today. S.R.JOSHI 1 of 2 SMITA RAJNIKANT JOSHI Digitally signed by SMITA RAJNIKANT JOSHI Date: 2025.11.08 17:05:52 +0530
4-ao-529-2021.doc 4 In these circumstances, it is clear that the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting this Appeal from Order. Hence, Appeal from
Order is dismissed for want of prosecution. There will be no order as to costs. 5 All pending Interim Application/s become infructous and are
disposed of as such.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA,J.) S.R.JOSHI 2 of 2