BHAGAVANTHAPPA S/O. RAMAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/101967/2021 · 2025-02-25
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7596 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7596 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3779 WP No. 101967 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 101967 OF 2021 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. BHAGAVANTHAPPA S/O. RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O HIREHADLIGI-583216, TALUK AND DIST. BALLARI. 2. LAKKAPPA @ LAKSHMAYYA S/O LATE LANKEPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O TEKKALAKOTE-583122, TALUK: SIRAGUPPA, DIST: BELLARY. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI S.S.BETURMTH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPTD. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING VIDHANA VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BALLARI DISTRICT BALLARI-583101. 3. THE TAHASILDAR SHIRAGUPPA-583121. TALUK SHIRAGUPPA, DIST.- BALLARI. 4. SRIKANT S/O MADHAVACHAR HAMPIHOLI, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER, R/O 158/4A, 9TH CROSS, III BLOCK, TYAGARAJNAGAR, BENGALURU-560028. ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.02.27 17:00:46 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3779 WP No. 101967 of 2021
5. SMT. LEELA W/O RANGANATH AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O 158/4A, 9TH CROSS, III BLOCK, TYAGARAJNAGAR, BENGALURU-560028. 6. SMT. ASHA W/O LATE BADRINATH AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O 158/4A, 9TH CROSS, III BLOCK, TYAGARAJNAGAR, BENGALURU-560028. 7. H.SRINIVAS S/O MADHAVACHAR HAMPIHOLI AGE: 75 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN R/O 158/4A, 9TH CROSS, III BLOCK, TYAGARAJNAGAR, BENGALURU-560028. 8. H.MURALIDHAR S/O MADHAVACHAR HAMPIHOLI AGE: 81 YEARS, OCC: NOT KNOWN R/O 158/4A, 9TH CROSS, III BLOCK, TYAGARAJNAGAR, BENGALURU-560028. 9. SMT. TEJASVINI D/O AMIT SAVANT AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O H.NO.2, 10TH CORSS, 7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-11. 10. SMT. NIVEDITA W/O VIKRAM AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O H.NO.2, 10TH CROSS, 7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-11. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V.S.KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3, SRI B.S. SANGATI, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R10)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE ORDER IN REV.LRM.APL.119.2011.12 DATED 30.06.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND CORRIGENDUM IN REV.LRM.APL.119.2011.12 DATED 11.11.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-L, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3779 WP No. 101967 of 2021
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1.
Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs : (i) Issue a writ of certiorari or order or direction quashing the order in rev.lrm.apl.119.2011.12 dated 30.06.2020 vide annexure-j and corrigendum in rev.lrm.apl.119.2011.12 dated 11.11.2020 vide annexure-l, passed by the respondent no.2.”
2. Memo dated 25.02.2025 has been filed signed by the petitioners as well as their counsel, which reads as under :
“1. That, the petitioners have filed present petition challenging the order in REV/LRM/APL/119/2011-12 dated 30.06/2020 vide Annexure-L and Corrigendum in REV/LRM/APL/119/2011-12 dated 30.06.2020 vide Annexure-N passed by respondent No.2. 2. It is submitted that now the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the writ petition further and they wish to withdraw the same. Therefore, the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the petition as it withdrawn in the ends of justice.”
3. Accepting the said memo, petition is dismissed as
withdraw. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE CKK CT:GSM